What You Get
Top 10 Reasons
Testimonials
Why Use Us?
Experience
One of the oldest and most respected fantasy sports services on the Internet, we've delivered the most innovative strategies, perspectives, predictions, player projections, and cool web-based tools on the market since 1995.
Results
No company has dominated the industry's "Expert Leagues" and polls than us, with 16 league titles total. Our subscriber won WCOFF in 2006, came in 2nd in 2007, as well as RotoBowl and 2nd place overall in the NFFC. These four readers alone won $270,000 in '06-'07.
Credentials
We were the first fantasy football web site to provide content for ESPN.com back in 1996, and we've been regularly seen and heard on NFL Network, Sirius NFL Radio, Comcast Sportsnet, and many more media outlets since then. The most "connected" fantasy sports service around, we interact with NFL players, coaches, analysts, agents, and insiders to give our subscribers the inside scoop.
Check out our content from Jan-July for free by joining our free mailing list. It's FREE!

2008 Sample article. Check out our Subscriber-Online Football Homepage here.

Subscribe for 2008 Here!
 
Offensive Identities
by Mike Horn
Staff Writer, FantasyGuru.com
Published, August 1, 2008

 

It’s still wise to understand a team’s identity” – John Hansen, “2005’s Lessons Learned”

 

The last few years, I’ve looked at how teams have organized their offenses, as well as what new coaches have brought from their old systems to their new teams, and used that information to try to predict who might surprise or disappoint in the coming season.

 

Sometimes I identify great opportunities and sometimes I’m wrong. For example, last year in this article, I was high on Ronnie Brown (right), thought Arizona would run the ball more (wrong) but throw to Edgerrin James less (right) and its tight ends very little (right). I was skeptical about Vince Jackson (mostly right) because Norv Turner would throw to his TEs more in SD than in SF (right). I thought Bruce Arians would cut Willie Parker’s carries (not really) and give the Steelers RBs more pass targets than in 2006 (wrong). I was right that Oakland would run more, but wrong that it would benefit LaMont Jordan. My favorite call was probably:

 

“The players most likely to benefit from Petrino’s system will be the WRs, who should see a lot more throws. Who will catch them, I don’t know, but if you’re late in a draft and looking for some WR depth, there will probably be a Falcon WR available who might help you out.”

 

because I took my own advice and got Roddy White late in one of my drafts. Anyway, you get the idea – there’s some good stuff in here but plenty of wrong thoughts, too, and some you have to interpret as camps and the preseason develop.

 

Below is a chart with an overall summary of each team’s run-pass mix, how often it gave its primary runner the ball, what positions get its pass targets, and how often the RB1 and WR1 are targeted. All this information is meant to help you interpret what an offense did the previous year. After the main chart, I look at the major coaching changes to try to predict how they will impact the offenses and fantasy prospects of players on those teams.

 

As always, there’s no absolute guarantee of what a team will do this year. Injuries last year may have dictated what a coach did, and that could change in 2008 if a key player returns to health. A weak defense may have forced an offense to pass more than it otherwise would have. A free agent addition (or subtraction) or high draft choice may have altered the talent enough to allow (or dictate) a coach to do something different this time around.

 

So, here’s the data, with the league average for each category included at the bottom and explanations of each column below:

 

2007 OFFENSES AT A GLANCE

 

Rush

Total

Total

Rush %

Total

Targets

Target %

Team

%

Plays

Rushes

RB1

Passes

RB

WR

TE

RB1

WR1

RB

WR

TE

RB1

WR1

ARI

40%

1016

402

89%

614

105

421

55

39

165

18%

72%

9%

37%

39%

ATL

39%

987

385

64%

602

106

353

89

57

137

19%

64%

16%

54%

39%

BAL

43%

1042

446

73%

596

102

340

98

49

162

19%

63%

18%

48%

48%

BUF

49%

919

448

69%

471

79

271

80

26

112

18%

63%

19%

33%

41%

CAR

46%

989

451

61%

538

90

309

92

35

147

18%

63%

19%

39%

48%

CHI

41%

1035

423

51%

612

120

295

140

27

128

22%

53%

25%

23%

43%

CIN

41%

1008

416

47%

592

96

420

43

67

167

17%

75%

8%

70%

40%

CLE

44%

1004

440

75%

564

102

260

170

39

153

19%

49%

32%

38%

59%

DAL

43%

975

419

53%

556

86

264

163

54

135

17%

51%

32%

63%

51%

DEN

44%

976

429

45%

547

81

321

107

14

170

16%

63%

21%

17%

53%

DET

34%

965

324

55%

641

94

435

39

45

126

17%

77%

7%

48%

29%

GB

39%

985

388

55%

597

121

349

97

35

122

21%

62%

17%

29%

35%

HOU

43%

968

417

48%

551

115

272

111

26

106

23%

55%

22%

23%

39%

IND

44%

1020

446

63%

574

82

296

163

49

155

15%

55%

30%

60%

52%